"nonconjunctive" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "non",
        "3": "conjunctive"
      },
      "expansion": "non- + conjunctive",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From non- + conjunctive.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "nonconjunctive (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with non-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1878 November 21, “Answers to Queries”, in New-England Journal of Education, volume VIII, number 20, Boston, Mass., page 323, column 3",
          "text": "[…]but we must confess that after reading his structural analyzation, showing the conjoinification of the prepositionally-constructed imagination to be a “simple sentence,” with the structurally incomplete, nonconjunctive, notional “I,” — poor little pronoun! — representing the basis of a distinctive prepositional structure, and “taught” a similarly expanded diminutive (“have” bearing a symbolical relationship, simply), that the three remaining elements seem rather to be taken into full sub-membership, making the adjunctability of the conjunctive arrangement “implicit” (that is connectionally informal), while the incompleteness of the unconfused conformatory thought expresses its sub-membership, — we find little, if any, light thrown upon the subject;",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1934, Maine Reports: Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, page 363",
          "text": "Allegation is of independent neglect through nonconjunctive delinquency of defendants.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1959, Anthropological Linguistics, page 415",
          "text": "The fact that the negator is clearly a sequence of two words when nominalized or conjunctive suggests that even its nonnominalized, nonconjunctive form is really two words:[…]",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not conjunctive."
      ],
      "id": "en-nonconjunctive-en-adj-Skca~Rj0",
      "links": [
        [
          "conjunctive",
          "conjunctive"
        ]
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "non-conjunctive"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nonconjunctive"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "non",
        "3": "conjunctive"
      },
      "expansion": "non- + conjunctive",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From non- + conjunctive.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "nonconjunctive (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with non-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1878 November 21, “Answers to Queries”, in New-England Journal of Education, volume VIII, number 20, Boston, Mass., page 323, column 3",
          "text": "[…]but we must confess that after reading his structural analyzation, showing the conjoinification of the prepositionally-constructed imagination to be a “simple sentence,” with the structurally incomplete, nonconjunctive, notional “I,” — poor little pronoun! — representing the basis of a distinctive prepositional structure, and “taught” a similarly expanded diminutive (“have” bearing a symbolical relationship, simply), that the three remaining elements seem rather to be taken into full sub-membership, making the adjunctability of the conjunctive arrangement “implicit” (that is connectionally informal), while the incompleteness of the unconfused conformatory thought expresses its sub-membership, — we find little, if any, light thrown upon the subject;",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1934, Maine Reports: Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, page 363",
          "text": "Allegation is of independent neglect through nonconjunctive delinquency of defendants.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1959, Anthropological Linguistics, page 415",
          "text": "The fact that the negator is clearly a sequence of two words when nominalized or conjunctive suggests that even its nonnominalized, nonconjunctive form is really two words:[…]",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not conjunctive."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "conjunctive",
          "conjunctive"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "word": "non-conjunctive"
    }
  ],
  "word": "nonconjunctive"
}